ISSN: 2822-0838 Online

Impact of Citrullus colocynthis Seed Oil on the Plasma Fatty Acid Profile in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Rats

Chaabane-Sari Daoudi, Soualem-Mami Zoubida, Didi Amel, Yazit Sidi-Mohammed*, Chaouche Tarik, Meziane Radjaa-Kawthar, Lazzouni Hamadi-Abderrahmane, and Chaabane-Sari Meriem
Published Date : February 24, 2026
DOI : https://doi.org/10.12982/NLSC.2026.049
Journal Issues : Online First

Abstract Proper regulation of blood-lipid levels is crucial for preventing metabolic and cardiovascular disorders. The seeds of Citrullus colocynthis (CCO), traditionally used in Mediterranean folk medicine for their antidiabetic properties, are rich in unsaturated fatty acids and may correct dyslipidemia associated with diabetes. In this study, we investigated the metabolic effects of diets enriched with CCO, sunflower oil (SO), or olive oil (OO) in stz-induced diabetic rats (n = 5 per group) over two months. While all groups developed hyperglycemia after STZ injection, rats fed the CCO-enriched diet displayed significantly lower blood glucose levels than those fed SO or OO. Additionally, the CCO diet led to marked decreases in hepatic and plasma lipid parameters associated with atherogenesis, and improved fatty-acid profiles. These results suggest that C. colocynthis seed oil has beneficial regulatory effects on both glycemic and lipid metabolism, thereby offering potential as a dietary intervention to mitigate dyslipidemia and cardiovascular risk in diabetes.

 

Keywords: Diabetes, Rats, Diet, Citrullus colocynthis oil, Fatty acids, Lipid profile

 

Citation:  Daoudi, C-S., Zoubida, S-M., Amel, D., Sidi-Mohammed, Y., Tarik, C., Radjaa-Kawthar, M., Hamadi-Abderrahmane, L., and Meriem, C-S. 2026. Impact of Citrullus colocynthis seed oil on the plasma fatty acid profile in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Natural and Life Sciences Communications. 25(3): e2026049.

 

Graphical Abstract:

 

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of type 2 diabetes is continually rising worldwide (Pinto et al., 2020; Ghosal and Sinha 2023). Several factors contribute to its onset, including age, family history of diabetes, overweight, and a sedentary lifestyle (Cao et al., 2023). Furthermore, some studies implicate diets high in fat as an additional risk factor. Approximately 80% of individuals with type 2 diabetes are overweight or obese, which underscores obesity as a major determinant in the development of this serious and often insidious disease. However, no one is entirely immune to diabetes, even when adhering to healthy lifestyle habits (Shubrook et al., 2022).

 

A varied and balanced diet plays a fundamental role in diabetes prevention. Dietary recommendations emphasize the consumption of foods low in fat, salt, and added sugars, while promoting a higher intake of fiber-rich foods. Following guidelines such as Canadas Food Guide ensures adequate energy needs are met. Moreover, individuals with diabetes require personalized meal planning, as the distribution of macronutrients is essential for optimal glycemic control (Batulla et al., 2000).

 

An increased intake of monounsaturated (MUFA) fatty acids has been suggested to improve glycemic control and lipoprotein profiles in diabetic patients (Rojo et al., 2006). Epidemiological studies in both humans and rats indicate that high-fat diets (HFD) promote obesity. However, recent research highlights that beyond the overall quantity of fat, the type of dietary fatty acids critically influences insulin sensitivity. Saturated fatty acids (SFA) increase plasma cholesterol, triglycerides, and free fatty acids (FFA), while reducing insulin sensitivity. By contrast, polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) enhance insulin sensitivity, lower triglyceride and LDL-cholesterol levels, and raise HDL-cholesterol concentrations (Okami et al., 2021). Numerous metabolic studies have demonstrated that replacing saturated fats with vegetable oils rich in linoleic acid significantly lowers LDL cholesterol and other atherogenic lipids. A recent meta analysis of 40 randomized controlled trials confirmed that dietary linoleic acid substantially reduces LDL C compared with other fats (Wang et al., 2023). The NursesHealth Study notably found that higher intakes of n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids were significantly associated with a lower incidence of type 2 diabetes (Conlin et al., 2017).

 

Non-insulin-dependent diabetes is primarily characterized by decreased insulin sensitivity, leading to insulin resistance in target tissues such as the liver, skeletal muscle, and adipose tissue (Boden and Shulman, 2002; McGarry, 2002). Furthermore, impaired glucose-induced insulin secretion, correlated with reduced pancreatic β-cell mass, ultimately results in chronic hyperglycemia (Ferrannini et al., 2005).

 

Given the limitations and side effects of current antidiabetic drugs, there has been increasing interest in traditional medicinal plants with potential hypoglycemic properties, such as Citrullus colocynthis (colocynth).

 

Citrullus colocynthis (L.) Schrad. (bitter apple or colocynth) is a perennial vine of the gourd f Cucurbitaceae family native to arid and semi-arid regions of North Africa and the Middle East. It bears trailing stems with deeply lobed leaves and yellow monoecious blossoms that give rise to spherical fruits characterized by a strongly bitter mesocarp and seeds rich in fixed oils. Seed of Citrullus colocybthis rich in cucurbitacins, flavonoids, phenolic compounds, Fixed oils with high unsaturated-fatty-acid content. Traditionally used as antidiabetic and anti-inflammatory. Extracts from C. colocynthis seeds and fruit show hypoglycemic, lipid-modulating, antioxidant and antimicrobial effects in experiments. But too high doses can cause strong gastrointestinal and liver toxicity. (Benariba et al., 2009; Fallah-Huseini et al., 2023; Rao and Amrita, 2023). This profile identifies the plant as a potentially valuable but safety-dependent candidate for continued pharmacological studies in the field of metabolic disorders Among various vegetable oils, this study used C. colocynthis seed oil in an isocaloric diet administered to male Wistar rats rendered diabetic by streptozotocin (STZ). This plant is recognized for its many therapeutic properties, particularly its antidiabetic effects (Benariba et al., 2009). For the first time, this study evaluates the effect of C. colocynthis oil (CO) compared with sunflower (SO) and olive oils (OO) on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism as well as on hepatic function. Accordingly, glucose, insulin, and lipid parameters were measured in both diabetic and non-diabetic rats.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plant identification

The plant material was identified as Citrullus colocynthis (L.) Schrad. (Cucurbitaceae). Specimens were collected in Naâma Province, western Algeria, on the High Plateaus (33°3237N, 0°1522W; ca. 1 133 m a.s.l.). The species identification was confirmed by Gérard Bélsir, and a voucher specimen (Id: ph005_12; code Gdb/ANSA) has been deposited in the Herbarium of the National Higher School of Agronomy (ENSA), El Harrach, Algeria.

 

Seed collection and oil extraction

The fruits were sliced in half, and the seeds were manually removed. Only mature black seeds were selected, and the pulp was thoroughly discarded. The seeds were then ground into a fine powder in preparation for oil extraction.

 

 The lipid fraction was extracted using petroleum ether (4060 °C) with a Soxhlet apparatus for 2 hours. The olive and sunflower oils used in this study were obtained from commercially available sources, and represent some of the most commonly consumed edible oils.

 

Fatty acids analysis of dietary oils (SO/CO/OO)

Fatty acids of dietary oils (SO/CO/OO), were identified by gas chromatography (GC) (Varian CP-3380) using a capillary column (Alltech EC-Wax, 30 m × 0.53 mm × 1.2 μm film thickness) equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID). Helium was used as the mobile phase. The oven temperature was maintained at 250°C and the injection volume was 1 μL.      

 

The column temperature was initially held at 180°C for 2 minutes, then increased to 220°C at a rate of 6°C/min. After reaching 220°C, the temperature was held constant for 10 minutes (Ulberth et al., 1999).

 

Selection of animal

The study was conducted on thirty (30) male Wistar rats, weighing 80 ± 5 gThe rats were housed in colony cages (five rats per cage) at an ambient temperature of 25 ± 2 °C, under a 12-hour light/12-hour dark cycle and constant humidity of 60%. They had free access to their respective diets and water ad libitum. Food was replenished daily, and uneaten portions were discarded. Food consumption and growth rates were comparable across all groups throughout the two-month experimental period.

 

The rats were treated ethically, following the international guidelines for treating laboratory animals. In vivo manipulations test on Wistar rat were approved by the Ethical Committee of the University of Tlemcen, Algeria, number 1652,019. The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. All effort were made to minimize pain and distress, ensuring appropriate housing and handling, and promoting the overall well-being of the animals. Animals were divided into six groups (G): Table 1

 

Table 1. Experimental groups and dietary regimens assigned to rats.

Group

Diabetic status

Oil source (4%)

Protein source (16%)

Diet code

G1(n=5)

Non-diabetic

Sunflower oil (SF)

Casein

Diet 1-ND

G2(n=5)

Diabetic

Sunflower oil (SF)

Casein

Diet 1-D

G3(n=5)

Non-diabetic

Olive oil (OO)

Casein

Diet 2-ND

G4(n=5)

Diabetic

Olive oil (OO)

Casein

Diet 2-D

G5(n=5)

Non-diabetic

Colocynthis oil (CO)

Casein

Diet 3-ND

G6(n=5)

Diabetic

Colocynthis oil (CO)

Casein

Diet 3-D

Note: All experimental diets contained 16% casein as the protein source and differed only by the type of oil (4%) administered. ND: non-diabetic; D: diabetic

 

All experimental diets contained 16% casein, 4% oil, and a standard mineral and vitamin mix. The mineral mix provided essential macro- and trace elements, including calcium, potassium, sodium, magnesium, iron, manganese, copper, and zincThe vitamin mix included fat- and water-soluble vitamins such as vitamins A, D, E, C, B-complex vitamins, inositol, and biotin. Numerical values are omitted here for clarity. The composition of the diets is shown in Table 2.

 

Table 2. Ingredient composition (g/100g) of the diet groups:(D1/D2/D3).

Constituant

Diet 1 (SO)

Diet 2 (OO)

Diet 3 (CO)

Casein

16

16

16

Methionine

0.3

0.3

0.3

Starch

55.7

55..7

55.7

Sucrose

05

05

05

Cellulose

05

05

05

Mineral Mix

    

 

7.37

7.37

7.37

Vitamin Mix

02

02

02

Sunflower oil (SO)

04

-

-

Dietary fatty acids

 

 

 

SFA

0.89

0.70

0.68

MUFA

2.40

2.59

0.34

PUFA

0.69

0.71

2.97

PUFA/SFA

0.70

1.01

0.76

Energy Values (Kcal/100g)

371.9

371.9

371.9

Note: SFA: Sum of the saturated fatty acids; MUFA: Sum of the mono-unsaturated fatty acids; PUFA: Sum of the poly-unsaturated fatty acids.

 

Induction of experimental diabetes

Two weeks after the start of the study, 50% of the rats in each group were randomly selected to be rendered diabetic by a single intraperitoneal injection of STZ (Sigma Aldrich, C18H15N3O7) was dissolved in ice-cold 0.1 M citrate buffer (pH 4.5) at a concentration of 10 mg/mL, kept on ice, and administered intraperitoneally at a dose of 65 mg/kg body weight. This injection was performed after 3 weeks on the diet (15 rats). The remaining 15 rats served as non-diabetic controls and received an intraperitoneal injection of citrate buffer alone at the same time point.

 

All rats were fasted overnight prior to the induction of diabetes or control buffer injection 0.1 M citrate, pH 7.6 (Szkudelski, 2001).

 

Surgery and blood samples preparation

Fasting blood glucose was measured before the administration of STZ at t = 0 h, 48 h, 144 h, and 336 h after injection of STZ or citrate buffer. Blood samples were collected from the tip of the tail vein at these time points. Blood glucose was determined using a glucometer (Accu-Chek Active, Roche, Mannheim, Germany). Diabetes was confirmed by blood glucose levels exceeding 1.26 g/L.

 

At the end of the experiment, all rats were fasted for 12 hours and then euthanized by intraperitoneal injection of 10% chloral hydrate (300 μL/100 g body weight). Blood was immediately collected from the abdominal aorta into tubes containing EDTA. Plasma was separated by centrifugation at 3,500 rpm for 15 minutes and used for biochemical analyses. The liver was excised, weighed, and processed for further analyses.

 

Determination of total cholesterol (TC), triacylglycerol (TG) and free fatty acids (FFA)

Total cholesterol (TC), triacylglycerol (TG), and free fatty acids (FFA) were assayed using enzymatic kits, following the manufacturers instructions (Biosystem, Barcelona, Spain). Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol fractions were isolated by precipitation (Matthews et al., 1985).

 

Plasma fatty acids analysis

At time (t) t = 0 h, 48 h, 144 h, and 336 h, as well as after two months of diet, total serum lipids were extracted according to the method of Folch et al. (1957). Phospholipids were isolated by thin-layer chromatography and then transmethylated using BF3/methanol following saponification. Fatty acid methyl esters were analyzed by gas-liquid chromatography (GLC) using a Becker gas chromatograph (Becker Instruments).

 

The chromatograph was equipped with a 50 m capillary glass column packed with Carbowax 20M (Spiral RD, Contemor, France). C17:0 methyl esters served as internal standard. Identification of different fatty acids was performed by comparison with commercial standards, and peak areas were calculated using an ENICA21 integrator (Delsi Instruments, Suresnes) (Folch et al., 1957).

 

Liver lipid determination

The livers were rapidly excised, rinsed with 0.15 mol/L NaCl, and weighed after blotting with filter paper. 1.0 g of liver tissue was homogenized in 9 mL of 0.25 M sucrose using a Teflon homogenizer to obtain a uniform suspension. Total lipids were extracted from the homogenates according to the method of Folch et al. (1957). Liver triacylglycerols (TG), total cholesterol (TC), and free fatty acids (FFA) were measured using commercial assay kits (Biomérieux, Lyon, France) (Folch et al., 1956).

 

Statistical analysis

All data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Differences among the six groups were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukeys post hoc test for pairwise comparisons. A P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

 

To facilitate presentation and interpretation of multiple comparisons, we used a letter-grouping system: groups whose means share the same letter (e.g. “a, b, c”) are not significantly different from one another at P < 0.05, whereas groups bearing different letters are significantly different. Thus, each distinct letter (or combination of letters) defines a homogeneous subset of groups with statistically indistinguishable means. The resulting group-letter assignments are indicated in the tables summarizing the results.

 

RESULTS

Fatty acid composition of dietary oils

The analysis revealed distinct fatty acid profiles among the three oils (Table 3). Olive oil (D2) showed the highest content of monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA), mainly oleic acid (C18:1, 64.8 ± 2.5 g/100 g). Colocynthis oil (D3) was remarkably rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), especially linoleic acid (C18:2, 76.4 ± 3.82 g/100 g), resulting in the highest PUFA/SFA ratio (5.43 ± 1.80). Sunflower oil (D1) had the highest saturated fatty acid (SFA) content (22.2 ± 0.90 g/100 g), particularly palmitic acid (C16:0, 17.2 ± 1.5 g/100 g). Overall, each oil exhibited a characteristic lipid profile with potential nutritional implications.

 

Table 3. Percentages composition of the main fatty acids of dietary oils :( D1/D2/D3).

Fatty Acids (g/100g)

D1 (SO)

D2 (OO)

D3- (CO)

C16 :0

17.20 ± 1.50a

14.00 ± 1.20b

08.10 ± 0.82c

C18 :0

05 ± 0.40a

4.32 ± 0.50a

6.10 ± 0.45c

C18 :1

11.98 ± 1.10a

64.80 ± 2.50b

07.80 ± 0.39c

C18 :2

60.02 ± 1.80a

12.23 ±1.30b

76.40 ± 3.82c

C18 :3

1.90 ± 0.10a

1.50 ± 0.01b

0.50 ± 0.02c

C 20 :4

1.90 ± 0.10a

1.60 ± 0.08b

0.30 ± 0.01c

W SFA

22.20 ± 0.90a

18.32 ± 0.80b

14.20 ± 0.71c

WMUFA

60.02 ± 1.80a

64.80 ± 2.50a

7.80 ± 0.39c

WPUFA

15.75 ± 0.43a

15.53 ± 0.73a

77.20 ± 1.28c

PUFA/SFA

0.71 ± 0.43a

0.85 ± 0.06a

5.43 ± 1.80c

Note:   ∑ SFA: Sum of the saturated fatty acids; MUFA: Sum of the mono-unsaturated fatty acids; PUFA: Sum of the poly-unsaturated fatty acidsValues are expressed as mean ±SEM. Different letters indicate significant differences between groups (P < 0.05, Tukey HSD). The same letters indicate no statistical difference.

 

Effects of diet on food intake, body and liver weight, and glycemia in diabetic and control rats

At the end of the experiment, body weight was significantly lower in diabetic rats fed any of the three diets (groups 2, 4, and 6) compared to non-diabetic rats on the corresponding diets (groups 1, 3, and 5). However, the relative liver weight did not differ between diabetic and non-diabetic rats in any of the diet groups.

 

Moreover, both food and lipid intake, as well as glycemia, were higher in diabetic rats than in non-diabetic rats fed the same diet. Notably, glycemia in group 6 (diabetic rats fed C. colocynthis oil) was lower compared to groups 2 and 4 (diabetic rats fed sunflower oil and olive oil, respectively) throughout the experimental period. The results summarized in Table 4.

 

Table 4. Food intake, body weight (BW), relative liver weight, glycaemia, and insulinemia in diabetic and non-diabetic rats fed different diets (SO, OO and CO) (n=5).

 

G1

G2

G3

G4

G5

G6

Initial BW(g)

85 ± 4.39a

82.2 ± 2.83b

77.60 ± 2.37c

77 ± 3.68c

85 ± 4.04a

77 ± 3.40c

Final BW(g)

255 ± 4.00a

217 ± 5.09b

260.7 ± 3.60a

212 ± 5.38b

177.7 ± 5.61c

168 ± 7.92c

Food intake

(g/d/100gBW)

5.40 ± 0.09d

7.61 ± 0.20c

5.49 ± 0.06d

8.86 ± 0.20b

8.48 ± 0.29b

12.64 ± 0.36a

Lipid intake

(g/d/100g BW)

1.08 ± 0.08d

1.32 ± 0.13b

1.20 ± 0.14c

1.69 ± 0.12a

1.14 ± 0.07d

1.50 ± 0.080a

TEI: total energy intake (Kjoule/d/W0.75)

276 ± 0.33c

346 ± 1.26a

246 ± 0.67e

252 ± 0.47e

333 ± 0.78b

264.49 ± 0.69d

Liver weight (g)

9.38 ± 0.38a

8.64 ± 0.16ab

9.01 ± 0.84a

6.25 ± 0.86c

7.52 ± 0.43b

6.10 ± 0.57c

Relative liver weight

(g/100g BW)

3.67 ± 0.38a

3.98 ± 0.43b

3.45 ± 0.32c

2.94 ± 0.29d

4.24 ± 0.16e

3.63 ± 0.57e

Glycemia (m mol/l)

4.30 ± 0.01b

13.6 ± 0.1ab

5.40 ± 0.05bc

11.6 ± 0.20c

5.4 ± 0.1a

7.6 ± 0.60b

Note: Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Different letters indicate significant differences between groups (P < 0.05, Tukey HSD). The same letters indicate no statistical difference.

 

Liver and plasma lipoproteins, total cholesterol (TC), triacylglycerol (TG), and free fatty acids (FFA) in diabetic and non-diabetic rats fed different diets

Liver and plasma lipoproteins, total cholesterol (TC), triacylglycerol (TG), and FFA levels in diabetic and non-diabetic rats fed diets 1, 2, and 3 are presented in Table 4.

 

The results showed that liver and plasma cholesterol levels were significantly higher in groups 2 and 6 (diabetic rats fed diets 2 and 3) compared to groups 1 and 5 (non-diabetic rats fed the same respective diets). LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) was elevated in diabetic rats fed diets 1 and 2 compared to their non-diabetic counterparts. Conversely, HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) levels decreased in these diabetic groups. However, diabetic rats fed diet 3 exhibited LDL-C and HDL-C concentrations similar to those of non-diabetic rats fed the same diet.

 

Triacylglycerol levels in both liver and plasma were significantly higher in diabetic rats compared to non-diabetic rats fed the same diet. In contrast, FFA levels were significantly decreased in diabetic rats across all diets compared to their respective non-diabetic controls.

 

Interestingly, plasma total cholesterol and LDL-C were decreased in diabetic rats compared to non-diabetic controls fed the different diets, while HDL-C levels remained unchanged in diabetic rats fed diets 1 and 2.

 

Regarding liver FFA concentrations, no significant differences were observed between diabetic and non-diabetic rats fed diets 1 and 3, but a significant decrease was found in diabetic rats fed diet 2 compared to their non-diabetic counterparts.

 

Total liver lipid content was significantly decreased in diabetic rats fed diets 2 and 3 compared to non-diabetic rats fed the same diets. In contrast, diabetic rats fed diet 1 showed a significant increase in liver lipid content compared to their controls.

 

Table 5. Liver, plasma and lipoproteins total cholesterol, triacylglycerol and FFA in diabetic and non diabetic rat fed with different diets (SO, OO and CO) (n=5).

 

G1

G2

G3

G4

G5

G6

cholesterol (liver) (µmol/g of tissue)

3.18 ± 0.16c

4.08 ± 0.17b

3.06 ± 0.28c

6.02 ± 0.21a

1.84 ± 0.13d

4.04 ± 0.17b

Triacylglycerol liver (µmol/g of tissue)

7.07 ± 0.45b

10.00 ± 0.21a

9.42 ± 0.11a

9.80 ± 0.25a

6.60 ± 0.31b

9.5 ± 0.31a

FFA liver

(µmol/g of tissue)

378 ± 2.83a

307 ± 1.41b

429 ± 2.97c

249 ± 4.30d

452 ± 2.85e

407 ± 3.64f

Total lipids

(mg/g of liver)

155.03 ± 2.50d

160 ± 6.01d

285 ± 6.01a

214.7 ± 8.62b

288 ± 17.95a

194 ± 3.95c

Cholesterol (plasma) (g/l)

0.63 ± 0.08a

0.76 ± 0.01a

0.6 ± 0.11a

0.60 ± 0.20a

0.36 ± 0.08a

0.47 ± 0.01a

LDL(g/l)

0.18 ± 0.02a

0.30 ± 0.01b

0.18 ± 0.03a

0.36 ± 0.02b

0.16 ± 0.03a

0.15 ± 0.03a

HDL(g/l)

0.42 ± 0.02b

0.38 ± 0.02a

0.30 ± 0.11b

0.20 ± 0.08a

0.24 ± 0.18b

0.26 ± 0.03b

Triacylglycerol Plasma(g/l)

0.39 ± 0.01a

0.53 ± 0.03a

0.61 ± 0.15a

0.70 ± 0.32a

0.53 ± 0.01a

1.21 ± 0.02b

FFA Plasma(g/l)

0.51 ± 0.17ab

0.35 ± 0.05b

0.67 ± 0.04a

0.63 ± 0.05a

0.20 ± 0.03b

0.40 ± 0.11b

Note: Values are expressed as mean ±SEM. Different letters indicate significant differences between groups (P < 0.05, Tukey HSD). The same letters indicate no statistical difference. FFA liver: Non-Esterified Fatty Acids.

 

Lipid and fatty acid intake in diabetic and non-diabetic rats fed different diets

Compared with non-diabetic rats fed the same diets, diabetic rats had increased lipid intake. The composition of the dietary oils was reflected in the fatty-acid intake: groups 3 and 4 consumed more monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA), while groups 5 and 6 showed elevated polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA). Notably, rats receiving diet 3 (groups 5 and 6) had significantly higher n-6 fatty acid levels compared to other groups, underlining the distinctive fatty-acid profiles conferred by the different dietary oils. The detailed fatty-acid intake data are presented in Table 5.

 

Table 6. Lipids and fatty acids intake in diabetic and non-diabetic rats fed with different diet (SO, OO and CO).

 

G1

G2

G3

G4

G5

G6

Lipids intake(g/d)

Fatty acids intake (%):

1.08 ± 0.08c

1.32 ± 0.13b

1.20 ± 0.14bc

1.69 ± 0.12a

1.14 ± 0.07bc

1.50 ± 0.08a

SFA

22.14 ± 1.2bc

27.06 ± 0.42ab

20.88 ± 1.3bc

29.40 ± 1.6a

17.10 ± 1.4c

22.50 ± 0.8bc

MUFA

68.04 ± 5.0c

83.16 ± 3.1b

77.76 ± 5.1b

109.51 ± 6.0a

8.89 ± 1.0d

11.7 ± 0.3d

18:2n-6

13.82 ± 1.4d

16.89 ± 1.2d

16.80 ± 2.1d

23.66 ± 1.8c

87.09 ± 4.1b

114.6 ± 3.3a

20:4n-6

2.05 ± 0.08a

2.50 ± 0.2a

2.16 ± 0.2a

3.04 ± 0.6a

0.34 ± 0.01b

0.45 ± 0.04b

Total(n-6)

15.87 ± 2.1d

19.40 ± 1.6d

18.96 ± 3.1d

26.7 ± 2.3c

87.43 ± 6.2b

115.05 ± 3.4a

Total n-3

1.94 ± 0.2b

2.37 ± 0.4b

2.4 ± 0.6

3.38 ± 0.2a

0.57 ± 0.09c

0.75 ± 0.1c

PUFA

17.28 ± 2.3d

21.78 ± 0.2d

21.36 ± 1.7d

30.08 ± 0.6c

88.008 ± 2.4b

115.8 ± 5.8a

n-6/n-3

8.16 ± 1.3b

8.18 ± 0.9b

7.90 ± 1.2b

7.90 ± 1.5b

153.4 ± 8.4a

153.4 ± 3.2a

P/S

0.78 ± 0.02b

0.80 ± 0.1b

1.02 ± 0.9b

1.02 ± 0.3b

5.14 ± 1.2a

5.14 ± 0.9a

Note: Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Different letters indicate significant differences between groups (P < 0.05, Tukey HSD). The same letters indicate no statistical difference.

 

Fatty acid composition of serum in diabetic and non-diabetic rats fed different diets at various time points

The plasma fatty acid profiles of rats fed the different diets reflected the fatty acid composition of their respective dietary oils, with no major differences observed between diabetic and non-diabetic rats during the experimental period (Table 6, 7, 8, 9).

 

All groups fed with olive oil (OO) and sunflower oil (SO) diets exhibited significantly higher proportions of monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) compared to rats fed diet 3. This difference was mainly attributable to variations in oleic acid [18:1(n-9)] levels. Conversely, rats fed diet 3 showed a significant increase in polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), consistent with the Colocynthis oil content of this diet.

 

Regarding n-6 and n-3 fatty acids, values were similar across all groups. Similar observations were made for the PUFA/saturated fatty acid (SFA) ratio. In summary, plasma fatty acid composition closely correlated with fatty acid intake.

 

Table 7. Fatty acids composition of serum in diabetic and non-diabetic rats fed at time 0 hours.

Variable

G1

G2

G3

G4

G5

G6

SFA

48.60 ± 1.70ᵇ

47.82 ± 1.66ᵇ

52.46 ± 3.03ᵇ

53.32 ± 1.62ᶜ

22.10 ± 2.12ᵃ

21.20 ± 2.12ᵃ

MUFA

10.68 ± 1.60b

11.86 ± 1.52b

12.66 ± 1.42b

11.43 ± 1.42b

22.14 ± 0.83a

20.10 ± 0.83a

18:2n-6

12.89 ± 0.91ᵃ

11.88 ± 0.44ᵃ

13.42 ± 1.48ᵃ

12.00 ± 1.48ᵃ

22.20 ± 1.14ᵇ

20.30 ± 1.14ᵇ

20:4n-6

23.57 ± 1.90ᵃ

23.74 ± 1.96ᵃ

23.06 ± 2.60ᵃ

24.66 ± 2.60ᵇ

42.30 ± 1.97ᶜ

40.40 ± 1.97ᶜ

Total(n-6)

1.19 ± 0.10ᵇ

1.15 ± 0.10ᵇ

0.92 ± 0.03ᵃ

0.80 ± 0.03ᵃ

1.36 ± 0.12ᶜ

1.40 ± 0.12ᶜ

Total(n-3)

25.76 ± 2.01ᵃ

24.89 ± 2.09ᵃ

23.98 ± 3.03ᵃ

23.43 ± 2.18ᵃ

43.60 ± 1.10ᵇ

41.80 ± 1.09ᵇ

PUFA

19.80 ± 1.21ᵃ

20.64 ± 1.24ᵃ

25.06 ± 1.62ᵇ

30.82 ± 1.62ᶜ

31.10 ± 1.22ᶜ

28.85 ± 1.22ᶜ

n-6/n-3

0.92 ± 0.04ᵃ

0.92 ± 0.04ᵃ

0.95 ± 0.03ᵃ

0.90 ± 0.05ᵃ

1.23 ± 0.08ᶜ

1.13 ± 0.08ᵇ

PUFA/SFA

32.53 ± 1.40ᵃ

33.35 ± 2.67ᵃ

41.20 ± 3.65ᵇ

40.17 ± 4.83ᵇ

38.35 ± 2.67ᵃ

40.86 ± 1.83ᵇ

Note: Values are expressed as a percentage of the total fatty acids and are means ± S.E.M. Different letters indicate significant differences between groups (P < 0.05, Tukey HSD). The same letters indicate no statistical difference.

 

Table 8. Fatty acids composition of serum in diabetic and non-diabetic rats fed at time 48 hours.

Variable

G1

G2

G3

G4

G5

G6

SFA

17.12 ± 0.90ᵇ

18.23 ± 0.13ᵇ

12.10 ± 1.67ᵃ

11.92 ± 0.65ᵃ

27.23 ± 0.13ᶜ

28.60 ± 0.12ᶜ

MUFA

12.48 ± 0.95ᵃ

13.35 ± 1.48ᵃ

11.29 ± 0.90ᵃ

11.29 ± 0.81ᵃ

12.54 ± 1.48ᵃ

11.83 ± 1.93ᵃ

18:2n-6

20.60 ± 1.20ᵃ

21.58 ± 1.61ᵃ

23.35 ± 0.98ᵃ

23.21 ± 1.46ᵃ

41.76 ± 1.61ᶜ

40.43 ± 20.50ᵇ

20:4n-6

1.29 ± 0.10ᶜ

1.39 ± 0.13ᶜ

0.48 ± 0.03ᵃ

0.50 ± 0.01ᵃ

1.12 ± 0.13ᵇ

1.03 ± 0.00ᵇ

Total(n-6)

21.89 ± 0.90ᵃ

22.95 ± 1.74ᵃ

24.62 ± 0.94ᵃ

23.71 ± 1.52ᵃ

42.15 ± 1.74ᵇ

41.46 ± 2.90ᵇ

Total(n-3)

15.96 ± 1.72ᵃ

15.52 ± 1.67ᵃ

48.64 ± 8.60ᵇ

42.95 ± 12.34ᵇ

38.16 ± 1.67ᵇ

39.67 ± 4.27ᵇ

PUFA

1.22 ± 0.03ᶜ

1.29 ± 0.06ᶜ

0.58 ± 0.07ᵃ

0.59 ± 0.03ᵃ

1.09 ± 0.06ᵇ

1.01 ± 0.09ᵇ

n-6/n-3

35.10 ± 2.46ᵃ

33.50 ± 2.79ᵃ

32.50 ± 3.19ᵃ

34.40 ± 3.29ᵃ

34.10 ± 2.30ᵃ

33.10 ± 2.60ᵃ

P/S

23.24 ± 4.28ᵇ

26.30 ± 1.69ᶜ

21.60 ± 1.48ᵃ

23.40 ± 1.52ᵇ

20.60 ± 0.63ᵃ

18.70 ± 0.53ᵃ

Note: Values are expressed as a percentage of the total fatty acids and are means ± S.E.M. Different letters indicate significant differences between groups (P < 0.05, Tukey HSD). The same letters indicate no statistical difference.

 

Table 9. Fatty acids composition of serum in diabetic and non-diabetic rats fed time 144 hours.

Variable

G1

G2

G3

G4

G5

G6

SFA

17.12 ± 0.90ᵇ

18.23 ± 0.13ᵇ

12.10 ± 1.67ᵃ

11.92 ± 0.65ᵃ

27.23 ± 0.13ᶜ

28.60 ± 0.12ᶜ

MUFA

12.48 ± 0.95ᵃ

13.35 ± 1.48ᵃ

11.29 ± 0.90ᵃ

11.29 ± 0.81ᵃ

12.54 ± 1.48ᵃ

11.83 ± 1.93ᵃ

18:2n-6

20.60 ± 1.20ᵃ

21.58 ± 1.61ᵃ

23.35 ± 0.98ᵃ

23.21 ± 1.46ᵃ

41.76 ± 1.61ᶜ

40.43 ± 20.50ᵇ

20:4n-6

1.29 ± 0.10ᶜ

1.39 ± 0.13ᶜ

0.48 ± 0.03ᵃ

0.50 ± 0.01ᵃ

1.12 ± 0.13ᵇ

1.03 ± 0.00ᵇ

Total(n-6)

21.89 ± 0.90ᵃ

22.95 ± 1.74ᵃ

24.62 ± 0.94ᵃ

23.71 ± 1.52ᵃ

42.15 ± 1.74ᵇ

41.46 ± 2.90ᵇ

Total(n-3)

15.96 ± 1.72ᵃ

15.52 ± 1.67ᵃ

48.64 ± 8.60ᵇ

42.95 ± 12.34ᵇ

38.16 ± 1.67ᵇ

39.67 ± 4.27ᵇ

PUFA

1.22 ± 0.03ᶜ

1.29 ± 0.06ᶜ

0.58 ± 0.07ᵃ

0.59 ± 0.03ᵃ

1.09 ± 0.06ᵇ

1.01 ± 0.09ᵇ

n-6/n-3

35.10 ± 2.46ᵃ

33.50 ± 2.79ᵃ

32.50 ± 3.19ᵃ

34.40 ± 3.29ᵃ

34.10 ± 2.30ᵃ

33.10 ± 2.60ᵃ

P/S

23.24 ± 4.28ᵇ

26.30 ± 1.69ᶜ

21.60 ± 1.48ᵃ

23.40 ± 1.52ᵇ

20.60 ± 0.63ᵃ

18.70 ± 0.53ᵃ

Note: Values are expressed as a percentage of the total fatty acids and are means ± S.E.M. Different letters indicate significant differences between groups (P < 0.05, Tukey HSD). The same letters indicate no statistical difference.

 

Table 10. Fatty acids composition of serum in diabetic and non-diabetic rats at the end of the feeding period.

Variable

G1

G2

G3

G4

G5

G6

SFA

34.80 ± 3.10ᶜ

33.20 ± 2.40ᶜ

30.10 ± 2.50ᵇ

29.80 ± 2.60ᵇ

28.40 ± 2.30ᵃᵇ

27.90 ± 2.10ᵃ

MUFA

24.10 ± 2.90ᶜ

23.50 ± 2.60ᶜ

22.40 ± 2.20ᵇ

21.80 ± 2.30ᵇ

20.90 ± 2.00ᵃᵇ

19.80 ± 1.90ᵃ

18:2n-6

18.90 ± 1.80ᵃ

19.20 ± 1.60ᵃ

20.10 ± 1.70ᵃᵇ

20.40 ± 1.60ᵇ

21.50 ± 1.80ᶜ

21.80 ± 1.90ᶜ

20:4n-6

14.80 ± 1.50ᶜ

13.90 ± 1.40ᵇᶜ

13.20 ± 1.20ᵇ

12.80 ± 1.10ᵇ

12.50 ± 1.00ᵃᵇ

12.10 ± 0.90ᵃ

Total(n-6)

38.60 ± 2.90ᶜ

37.20 ± 2.70ᶜ

36.40 ± 2.50ᵇᶜ

35.90 ± 2.40ᵇ

35.60 ± 2.30ᵇ

35.20 ± 2.10ᵃᵇ

Total(n-3)

0.40 ± 0.05ᵃ

0.42 ± 0.06ᵃ

0.44 ± 0.07ᵃ

0.45 ± 0.08ᵃ

0.46 ± 0.07ᵃ

0.47 ± 0.06ᵃ

PUFA

39.00 ± 3.20ᶜ

37.60 ± 2.80ᶜ

36.80 ± 2.60ᵇᶜ

36.20 ± 2.50ᵇ

36.00 ± 2.30ᵇ

35.70 ± 2.10ᵃᵇ

n-6/n-3

96.50 ± 5.40ᶜ

88.60 ± 5.20ᵇᶜ

82.70 ± 5.00ᵇ

79.80 ± 4.90ᵇ

77.40 ± 4.80ᵃᵇ

75.10 ± 4.70ᵃ

P/S

1.15 ± 0.07ᶜ

1.12 ± 0.06ᶜ

1.08 ± 0.06ᵇᶜ

1.06 ± 0.05ᵇ

1.04 ± 0.05ᵇ

1.02 ± 0.04ᵃ

Note: Values are expressed as a percentage of the total fatty acids and are means ± S.E.M. Different letters indicate significant differences between groups (P < 0.05, Tukey HSD). The same letters indicate no statistical difference.

 

DISCUSSION

Diabetes is a complex metabolic disorder characterized by insufficient insulin secretion and insulin resistance (IR) induced hyperglycemia (Zhong et al., 2019; Almanza-Aguilera et al., 2020). Lifestyle and diet can be highly efficient in preventing and treating diabetes (Knowler et al., 2002). Study show tha high-fat diet intake for 10 weeks increased triglyceride and cholesterol levels serum in mice (Ruanpang et al., 2018), however high intake of saturated fatty acids (SFAs) increases the risk of cardiovascular disease due to LDL cholesterol in the blood, although polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) have the opposite effect (Schwab et al., 2014). Intake of unsaturated fatty acids (UFA), including monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), has been shown to reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Mediterranean diets rich in PUFA and MUFA have been asserted to be protective against the risk of T2D (Bozzetto et al., 2012; Martín-Peláez et al., 2020).

 

Medicinal plants can prevent diabetes complications by maintaining glycemic control, as well as the stability of lipid profiles. Vegetable seeds provide nutritionally beneficial compounds, including fats, fat-soluble vitamins, and phytosterols, which are important for human nutrition. C. colocynthis seed oil contains unsaturated fatty acids, may help reduce elevated plasma atherogenic parameters such as cholesterol and triglycerides linked to low-density lipoproteins, also Increased FFA flux to the liver, especially from visceral adipose tissue lipolysis, and promoted excessive endogenous glucose production (Qureshi and Abrams, 2007; Sebbagh et al., 2009).

 

In this context, we used Citrullus colocynthis seed oil, known for its therapeutic properties and traditional use among patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), in an isocaloric diet model of STZ-induced diabetic male Wistar rats particularly its ability to preserve pancreatic β-cell mass, and insulin sensitivity. (Sebbagh et al., 2009).

 

Supplementation with C. colocynthis oil in this study may also affect adipose tissue function, explaining the lower body weight observed in this group compared to the others, despite comparable food intake. At a cellular level, PUFA has been observed to play a role in repartitioning metabolic fuels for storage and oxidation by down-regulating the transcription of lipogenic genes and up-regulating the genes that promote lipid oxidation and thermogenesis (Clarke, 2000). Indeed, in a whole of diet context (Jones and Schoeller, 1988; Jones et al., 1992), studies have confirmed a greater fat-oxidizing effect acutely when the ratio of PUFA/SFA increases like that in C. colocynthis oil. Supplementation of the diet using fish oil (PUFA rich) has also been shown to increase fat oxidation (Delarue et al., 1996; Couet et al., 1997). Greater fat oxidation implies a lower retention in the body. This differential effect of fat subtypes means that the incorporation of PUFA into a diet may be beneficial in the promotion of negative fat balance and leads to the use of endogenous fat as energy sourceIt may be an important consideration in weight management where adipose tissue accumulation is integral to the problem.

 

Increased insulin secretion represents a compensatory response of pancreatic β-cells to maintain glucose homeostasis under conditions of reduced insulin sensitivity (Zhu et al., 2023). The mechanisms underlying insulin resistance are complex, involving defects downstream of insulin receptor signaling, including impaired message transmission and reduced biosynthesis of enzymatic effectors. Elevated circulating FFA, resulting from impaired insulin action that promotes lipolysis, further inhibit insulins effects on glucose metabolism (Samuel and Shulman, 2016).

 

Fatty acids are also recognized modulators of insulin secretion, with their effects depending on chain length and degree of saturation (Poitout and Robertson, 2008). Pancreatic β-cell function is influenced by these lipids, as recently demonstrated by Feng et al. (2006); their ubiquitous presence in tissues affects lipid metabolism and broader physiological functions (Chen et al., 2019). The data concur with these findings. Mechanistically, free fatty acids (FFAs), through their interaction with the free fatty acid receptor 1 (FFAR1) expressed on β-cells, potentiate glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS), particularly in contexts of increased insulin demand such as insulin resistance. Intracellularly, FFAs are metabolized to generate signaling lipids like long-chain acyl-CoA and diacylglycerol (DAG). Long-chain acyl-CoA can acylate key proteins involved in insulin granule exocytosis, such as SNAP-25 and synaptotagmin, facilitating vesicle fusion. In parallel, DAG activates protein kinase C (PKC) and interacts with the priming protein Munc-13, both of which promote insulin secretion. Thus, the degree of fatty acid unsaturation can modulate these signaling pathways, ultimately influencing the efficiency of insulin release from β-cells (Gonzalo and Linder, 1998; Rhee et al., 2002). 

 

The results demonstrate that vegetable oils, particularly C. colocynthis oil, protect and correct metabolic disturbances such as hyperglycemia and fatty acid metabolism perturbations, in accordance with their fatty acid profiles and possibly other bioactive molecules. Thus, vegetable oils, especially C. colocynthis oil, are beneficial for diabetes regulation due to their polyunsaturated and monounsaturated fatty acid content alongside phytosterols (e.g., β-sitosterol), tocopherols (α-tocopherol), and phenolic compounds (such as caffeic and ferulic acids), which are known for their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and metabolic activities.

 

Several studies have confirmed the beneficial effects of these components in normalizing plasma glucose concentrations in diabetes management (Delplanque et al., 2002; Chen et al., 2019). However, the results showed decreased plasma insulin concentration only in diabetic rats fed diets 1 and 2, consistent with mounting evidence that fatty acids influence stimulusresponse coupling in pancreatic β-cells (Elkanawati et al., 2024).

 

Insulin-resistant type 2 diabetes is commonly associated with increased plasma concentrations of triglycerides, FFA, and cholesterol (Yaney and Corkey, 2003). In the present study, we observed a significant increase in plasma total cholesterol, LDL-C, FFA, and triglyceride levels in diabetic rats fed different diets compared to non-diabetic controls, while HDL-C levels remained unchanged, as shown in Table 4. Elevated plasma LDL cholesterol and triglycerides are strongly associated with accelerated atherosclerosis (Fève et al., 2006), and numerous studies have demonstrated the beneficial effects of vegetable oils on these parameters (Howard, 1999). Moreover, Howard (1999) suggested that LDL particles isolated from rabbits fed high vegetable oil diets exhibited remarkable resistance to oxidative stress. Metabolic studies have also reported strong cholesterol-lowering effects of vegetable oils rich in linolenic acid (Sebbagh et al., 2007).

 

The plant under study exhibits promising pharmacological activities, including hypoglycemic and lipid-lowering effects, as demonstrated in this experimental model. However, its potential toxicity should not be overlooked. High doses or prolonged use may induce adverse effects, emphasizing the importance of carefully evaluating its safety profile in addition to its therapeutic potential. These considerations highlight the need for further studies to determine safe dosage ranges and to better understand the balance between efficacy and toxicity for potential clinical applications.

 

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, this study demonstrates that dietary supplementation with  Citrullus colocynthis seed oil significantly improves glucose homeostasis, and favorably modulates plasma lipid profiles in stz-induced diabetic rats. These beneficial effects are likely attributable to the oils unique composition, particularly its enrichment in polyunsaturated and monounsaturated fatty acids, which appear to contribute to improved insulin sensitivity and overall metabolic regulation.

 

Further studies should identify the bioactive compounds in C. colocynthis oil and clarify their molecular mechanisms. Additional preclinical and clinical research is also required to assess its safety and effectiveness. Overall, the findings indicate that C. colocynthis oil may serve as a supportive natural option for metabolic health.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Laboratory of Natural Products for its generous support in providing the reagents and equipment required for this research.

 

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Chaabane-Sari Daoudi: Supervision (Lead), Data Curation (Equal), Formal Analysis (Equal), Writing Original Draft (Equal), Writing Investigation (Lead); Soulem-Mami Zoubida: Data Curation (Equal), Formal Analysis (Equal), Writing Review & Editing (Equal), Investigation (Lead); Didi Amel: Data Curation (Equal), Writing Review & Editing (Supporting), Investigation (Supporting); Yazit Sidi-Mohammed: Conceptualization (Equal), Methodology (Lead), Formal Analysis (Lead), Writing Review & Editing (Lead), Project administration (Equal);  Chaouche Tarek: Formal Analysis (Supporting), Validation (Equal), Data Curation (Lead), Investigation (Supportive), Supervision (Equal); Lazzouni Hamadi-Abderrahmane: Validation (Lead), Resource (Supporting), Writing Review & Editing (Lead), Investigation (Equal); Chaabane-Sari Meriem: Data Curation (Equal), Validation (Supporting), Writing Review & Editing (Lead), Investigation (Equal).

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they hold no competing interests.

 

REFERENCES

Almanza-Aguilera, E., Hernáez, Á., Corella, D., Sanllorente, A., Ros, E., and Portolés, O. 2020. Cancer signaling transcriptome is upregulated in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 10(1): 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10010085

 

Batulla, S., Fitzimons, O., and Morenos, S. 2000. Postprandial apolipoprotein B-48 and B-100-containing lipoproteins in type 2 diabetes: Do status have a specific effect on triglyceride metabolism. Metabolism. 49: 1049-1054. https://doi.org/10.1053/meta.2000.7744

 

Benariba, N., Djaziri, R., Zerriouh, B.H., Boucherit, K., Louchami, K., Sener, A., and Malaisse, W.J. 2009. Antihyperglycemic effect of Citrullus colocynthis seed aqueous extracts in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Metabolic Function Research in Diabetes. 2: 71-77.

 

Boden, G. and Shulman, G. 2002. Free fatty acids in obesity and type 2 diabetes: Defining their role in the development of insulin resistance and beta-cell dysfunction. European Journal of Clinical Investigation. 32(3): 14-23. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2362.32.s3.3.x

 

Bozzetto, L., Prinster, A., Annuzzi, G., Costagliola, L., Mangione, A., and Vitelli, A. 2012. Liver fat is reduced by an isoenergetic MUFA diet in a controlled randomized study in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 35: 1429-1435. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc12-0033

 

Cao, H., Rao, X., Jia, J., Yan, T., and Li, D. 2023. Effects of sodium glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors on kidney, cardiovascular, and safety outcomes in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Acta Diabetologica. 60(3): 325-335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-022-01989-7

 

Chen, L., Chen, X.W., Huang, X., Song, B.L., Wang, Y., and Wang, Y. 2019. Regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism in health and disease. Science China Life Sciences. 62(11): 1420-1458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-019-1563-3

 

Clarke, S.D. 2000. Polyunsaturated fatty acid regulation of gene transcription: A mechanism to improve energy balance and insulin resistance. British Journal of Nutrition. 83 (Supplement 1): S59-S66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114500000969

 

Conlin, P.R., Colburn, J., Aron, D., Pries, R.M., Tschanz, M.P., and Pogach, L. 2017. Synopsis of the 2017 U.S. Department of veterans affairs/U.S. department of defense clinical practice guideline: Management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Annals of Internal Medicine. 167: 655-663. https://doi.org/10.7326/M17-1362

 

Couet, C., Delarue, J., Ritz, P., Antoine, J.M., and Lamisse, F. 1997. Effect of dietary fish oil on body fat mass and basal fat oxidation in healthy adults. International Journal of Obesity. 21: 637-643. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0800451

 

Delarue, J., Couet, C., Cohen, R., Brechot, J.F., Antoine, J.M., and Lamisse, F. 1996. Effects of fish oil on metabolic responses to oral fructose and glucose loads in healthy humans. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism. 270: E353-E362. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.1996.270.2.E353

 

Delplanque, B., Leroy, B., and Mendy, F. 2002. Équilibre entre acides gras saturés: Contribution à l'étude de la prévention des maladies cardiovasculaires. Oléagineux, Corps Gras, Lipides. 9: 237-243. https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl.2002.0237

 

Elkanawati, R.Y., Sumiwi, S.A., and Levita, J. 2024. Impact of lipids on insulin resistance: Insights from human and animal studies. Drug Design, Development and Therapy. 18: 3337-3360. https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S468147

 

Fallah-Huseini, H., Bahadori, A., Nikkhah, E., and Ziaee, M. 2023. Citrullus colocynthis (L.) Schrad: A promising prospect-ethnobotany, phytochemistry, pharmacology, and toxicity. Biomedical Research & Reviews. 1(2): 77-83. https://doi.org/10.34172/biomedrb.2023.14

 

Feng, D.D., Luo, Z., Roh, S.G., Hernandez, M., Tawadros, N., Keating, D.J., and Chen, C. 2006. Reduction in voltage-gated K+ currents in primary cultured rat pancreatic beta-cells by linoleic acids. Endocrinology. 147(2): 674-682. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2005-0225

 

Ferrannini, E., Gastaldelli, A., Miyazaki, Y., Matsuda, M., Mari, A., and DeFronzo, R. 2005. Beta-cell function in subjects spanning the range from normal glucose tolerance to overt diabetes: A new analysis. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 90(1): 493-500. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2004-1133

 

Fève, B., Bastard, J.P., and Vidal, H. 2006. Les relations entre obésité, inflammation et insulinorésistance: Acquisitions récentes [Relationship between obesity, inflammation and insulin resistance: New concepts]. Comptes Rendus Biologies. 329(8): 587–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2006.03.020

 

Folch, J., Lee, S.M., and Stanley, G.H.S. 1957. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal studies. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 226: 497.

 

Ghosal, S. and Sinha, B. 2023. Finerenone in type 2 diabetes and renal outcomes: A random-effects model meta-analysis. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 14: 1114894. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1114894

 

Gonzalo, S. and Linder, M.E. 1998. SNAP-25 palmitoylation and plasma membrane targeting require a functional secretory pathway. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 9(3): 585-597. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.9.3.585

 

Howard, B.V. 1999. Insulin resistance and lipid metabolism. American Journal of Cardiology. 84(1): 28-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(99)00355-0

 

Jones, P.J.H. and Schoeller, D.A. 1988. Polyunsaturated: Saturated ratio of diet fat influences energy substrate utilization in the human. Metabolism. 37: 145-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0026-0495(98)90009-9

 

Jones, P.J.H., Ridgen, J.E., Phang, P.T., and Birmingham, C.L. 1992. Influence of dietary fat polyunsaturated to saturated ratio on energy substrate utilization in obesity. Metabolism. 41: 396-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/0026-0495(92)90074-K

 

Knowler, W.C., Barrett-Connor, E., Fowler, S.E., Hamman, R.F., Lachin, J.M., Walker, E.A., and Nathan, D.M. 2002. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. New England Journal of Medicine. 346: 393-403. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa012512

 

Martín-Peláez, S., Fito, M., and Castaner, O. 2020. Mediterranean diet effects on type 2 diabetes prevention, disease progression, and related mechanisms. A review. Nutrients. 12: 2236. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12082236

 

Matthews, D., Hosker, J., Rudenski, A., Naylor, B., Treacher D., and Turner, R. 1985. Homeostasis model assessment: Insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 28: 412-419. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00280883 

 

McGarry, J.D. 2002. Banting lecture 2001: Dysregulation of fatty acid metabolism in the etiology of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 51(1): 7-18. https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.51.1.7

 

Okami, Y., Pimentel, A.S., Barbosa-Lima G.S., Santoni-Rugiu E., Guedes-Pinto, G.A., and Ribeiro, A.C .2021. Omega-3 fatty acids improve functionality of high-density lipoprotein in individuals with high cardiovascular risk: A randomized, parallel, controlled and double-blind clinical trial. Frontiers in Nutrition. 8: 767535. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.767535

 

Pinto, L.C., Rados D.V., Remonti, L.R., Viana, L.V., Pulz, G.T., Carpena, M.P., Carpena, M.P., Borges, R.P., Marobin, R., Beretta, M.V., et al. 2020. Patient-centered management of type 2 diabetes mellitus based on specific clinical scenarios: Systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 105(11): dgaa534. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaa534

 

Poitout, V. and Robertson, R.P. 2008. Glucolipotoxicity: Fuel excess and β-cell dysfunction. Endocrine Reviews. 29(3): 351-366. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2007-0023

 

Qureshi, K. and Abrams, G.A. 2007. Metabolic liver disease of obesity and role of adipose tissue in the pathogenesis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 13(26): 3540-3553. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v13.i26.3540

 

Rao, V. and Amrita P. 2023. Bitter apple (Citrullus colocynthis) fruit: Bioactive compounds, nutritional profile, and uses. Food Production, Processing and Nutrition. 5: 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43014-022-00118-9

 

Rhee, J.S., Betz, A., Pyott, S., Reim, K., Varoqueaux, F., Augustin I., Hesse, D., C-Südhof, T., Takahashi, M., Rosenmund, C., et al. 2002. Beta phorbol ester- and diacylglycerol-induced augmentation of transmitter release is mediated by Munc13s and not by PKCs. Cell. 108(1): 121-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00635-3

 

Rojo-Martínez, G., Esteva, I., Ruiz de Adana, M.S., García-Almeida, J.M., Tinahones, F., Cardona, F., Morcillo, S., García-Escobar, E., García-Fuentes, E., and Soriguer, F. 2006. Dietary fatty acids and insulin secretion: A population-based study. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 60(10): 1195-1200. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602437

 

Ruanpang, J., Pleumsamran, A., Pleumsamran, J., and Mingmalairak, S. 2018. Effect of a high-fat diet and cholesterol levels on depression-like behavior in mice. Chiang Mai University Journal of Natural Sciences. 17(1): e0012. https://doi.org/10.12982/CMUJNS.2018.0012

 

Samuel, V.T. and Shulman, G.I. 2016. The pathogenesis of insulin resistance: Integrating signaling pathways and substrate flux. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 126(1): 12-22. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI77812

 

Schwab, U., Lauritzen, L., Tholstrup, T., Haldorsson, T.I., Risérus, U., Uusitupa, M., and Becker, W. 2014. Effect of the amount and type of dietary fat on cardiometabolic risk factors and risk of developing type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and cancer: A systematic review. Food & Nutrition Research. 58: 25145. https://doi.org/10.3402/fnr.v58.25145

 

Sebbagh, N., Chabane Sari, D., Taleb, S.A., Benyoucef, M., Lahouel, M., Ktorza, A., and Magnan, C. 2007. Effects of dietary colocynthis and sunflower fatty acids containing oils on lipid metabolism and oxidative stress parameters in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Research Journal of Applied Sciences. 2(7): 832-838. https://doi.org/rjasci.2007.832.838

 

Sebbagh, N., Cruciani-Guglielmacci, C., Ouali, F., Berthault, M.F., Rouch, C., Chabane Sari, D., and Magnan, C. 2009. Comparative effects of Citrullus colocynthis, sunflower and olive oil-enriched diet in streptozotocin-induced diabetes in rats. Diabetes & Metabolism. 35(3): 178-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabet.2008.10.005

 

Shubrook, J.H., Neumiller, J.J., and Wright, E. 2022. Management of chronic kidney disease in type 2 diabetes: Screening, diagnosis and treatment goals, and recommendations. Postgraduate Medicine. 134(4): 376-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.2021.2009726

 

Szkudelski, T. 2001. The mechanism of alloxan and streptozotocin action in B cells of the rat pancreas. Physiological Research. 50(6): 537-546. https://doi.org/10.33549/physiolres.930111

 

Ulberth, F., Gabernig, R.G., and Schrammel, F. 1999. Flame-ionization detector response to methyl, ethyl, propyl, and butyl esters of fatty acids. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society. 76: 263-266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-999-0228-7

 

Wang, Q., Zhang, H., Jin, Q., and Wang, X. 2023. Effects of dietary linoleic acid on blood lipid profiles: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 40 randomized controlled trials. Foods. 12(11): 2129. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12112129

 

Yaney, G.C. and Corkey, B.E. 2003. Fatty acid metabolism and insulin secretion in pancreatic beta cells. Diabetologia. 46(10): 1297-1312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-003-1207-4

 

Zhong, X., Chen, Z., Chen Q., Zhao, W., and Chen, Z. 2019. Novel site-specific fatty chain-modified GLP-1 receptor agonist with potent antidiabetic effects. Molecules. 24(4): 779. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24040779

 

Zhu, X., Chen, L., Lin, J., Ba, M., Liao, J., Zhang, P., and Zhao, C. 2023. Association between fatty acids and the risk of impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes mellitus in American adults: NHANES 2005-2016. Nutrition & Diabetes. 13(1): 8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41387-023-00236-4

  

OPEN access freely available online

Natural and Life Sciences Communications

Chiang Mai University, Thailand. https://cmuj.cmu.ac.th

Chaabane-Sari Daoudi1, Soualem-Mami Zoubida1, Didi Amel2, Yazit Sidi-Mohammed* 1, 3, Chaouche Tarik1, Meziane Radjaa-Kawthar1, Lazzouni Hamadi-Abderrahmane1, and Chaabane-Sari Meriem1

 

1 Natural Products Laboratory, Department of Biology, Faculty of Natural and Life Sciences, Earth and Universe Sciences, University Abou-Bekr Belkaid, Tlemcen 13000, Algeria.

2 Laboratory of Separation and Purification Techniques, Faculty of Science, University Abou-Bekr Belkaid, Tlemcen 13000, Algeria.

3 Departments of Biology, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, Belhadj Bouchaib University, Ain Temouchent 46000, Algeria.

 

Corresponding author: Yazit Sidi-Mohammed, E-mail: mohammed.yazit@univ-temouchent.edu.dz

 

ORCID iD:

Yazit Sidi-Mohammed: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7599-2643

Meziane Radjaa-Kawthar: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9224-6068

Soualem-Mami Zoubida: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0101-8184

Chaouche Tarik: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7450-0206

Lazzouni Hamadi-Abderrahmane: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9388-1390

 


Total Article Views


Editor: Wipawadee Yooin

Sirasit Srinuanpan,

Chiang Mai University, Thailand

 

Article history:

Received: September 29, 2025;

Revised:  December 31, 2025;

Accepted: January 30, 2026;

Online First: February 24, 2026