ISSN: 2822-0838 Online

Unique Genetic Structure of Y-chromosomal Lineage of the Moken from the Andaman Sea of Thailand

Tanapon Seetaraso, Wibhu Kutanan, Jatupol Kampuansai, Kanha Muisuk, and Metawee Srikummool*
Published Date : 2020-09-01
DOI : https://doi.org/10.12982/CMUJNS.2020.0066
Journal Issues : Number 4, October-December 2020

ABSTRACT To investigate the genetic structure of the Y-chromosome of the Moken people living in the Andaman Sea area of Thailand, and to compare the genetic relationship between them and other groups on the mainland, as well as the islands Southeast Asia. This study analyzed 17 Y-chromosomal short tandem repeat (Y-STR) loci in 11 unrelated Moken males from Ranong Province of Thailand. The genomic DNA was extracted from buccal cells, and amplified using an AmpFℓSTR Yfiler PCR Amplification Kit. We compared Y-STR genotypes with other populations from the Y Chromosome Haplotype Reference Database (YHRD) and constructed the multidimensional scaling (MDS) plot and the neighbor-joining tree (NJ), based on genetic distance Rst. Nine different haplotypes from 11 unrelated individuals were identified. The haplotype diversity was 0.9455 ± 0.066, which was closer to other Southeast Asian populations. The genetic relationship results also showed the genetic differentiation of the Moken, without any significant differences among them, as well as some Austronesian (AN) groups from Malaysia and Sino-Tibetan (ST) groups from Taiwan. This study suggests that there was a unique genetic structure on the Y-chromosome of the Moken from the Andaman Sea, showing genetic relations with some AN and ST groups.

 

Keywords: Y chromosomal-STR, Genetic structure, Moken, Andaman Sea

 INTRODUCTION 

The Moken is one of the sea nomad groups, who inhabit the coastal area and islands of the Andaman Sea, in the southern part of Thailand, and are distributed up the coast of the Mergui Archipelago of Myanmar. The ancestors of the Moken people might have lived on the Southeast Asian (MSEA) mainland which is now Myanmar, and spread southwards to Malaysia (Hinshiranan, 1996). The alternative in hypothesis of the origin of the Moken is that they originated in the islands of Southeast Asia (ISEA) (Koechlin, 1967). However, genetic evidence, supports the hypothesis that the Moken originated within the coastal region of MSEA before migrating to ISEA (Dancause et al., 2009). Thus, the origins of the Moken are still debated.

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and Y-chromosomal DNA are two uniparental genetic markers, which are commonly used to reconstruct population history, and investigate the genetic relationship among populations, including the tracing of lineages of populations (Richards et al., 2000; Maca-Meyer et al., 2001; Y Chromosome Consortium, 2002; Jobling and Tyler, 2003; Barbieri et al., 2013). mtDNA is maternally inherited, while the Y-chromosome is a useful tool to study paternal ancestry, because it is passed down from father to son and the majority of its DNA lacks recombination (Y Chromosome ; Jobling and Tyler, 2003; Santana et al., 2014). A previous study of the mtDNA variation of the Moken living in Phuket province of Thailand indicated a low mitochondrial diversity and distract genetic structure from Austronesian speaking groups and the MSEA people (Lum et al., 1998). Another study of mtDNA variation of the Moken, who live in the Mergui Archipelago of Myanmar, reported the basal mtDNA lineage of the Moken; observed M21b2 and M46a (Dancause et al., 2009). A recent mtDNA study of the Moken from Chang Island suggested the signal of the influence of genetic drift. The identified mitochondrial lineages were M21b2, D4e1a, M46a and F1a1c1. The genetic relationship analysis suggested that the Moken on Chang Island shared common ancestors with the Moken people in the Mergui Archipelago and with some Austroasiatic speaking groups in MSEA. It also suggested that the Moken originated on the MSEA before migration to the islands (Seetaraso et al., 2019). However, the study of paternal lineage of the Moken people have not been studied.        

In this study, we aim to investigate the genetic structure of Y-chromosomal DNA in the Moken people from Andaman Sea of Thailand and compare the genetic relationship between them and other published data. We examined the genotype 17 Y-chromosomal STR loci using AmpFSTR Yfiler PCR Amplification Kit (Applied Biosystems, USA), from 11 Moken males. We found a unique genetic structure of Y-chromosomal lineage in the male Moken. 

 

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS 

Studied populations     

This study was approved by the Naresuan University Institutional Review Board (COA No. 0464/2017). Buccal samples were collected with informed consent from 11 unrelated male volunteers from Chang Island in the Ranong Province of Thailand (TH-MG) (Figure 1). The recruitment criteria for volunteers was unrelated men belonging to the Moken from Chang Island having at least two generations of ancestors, without any genetic admixed by other tribes. DNA was extracted from the buccal cells with the Gentra Puregene Buccal Cell Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Sample DNA quantity and purity were determined by NanoDrop 2,000 UV-Vis Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The Y-chromosomal STR data from 59 populations on the mainland as well as the islands of Southeast Asia (Table 1), were taken from the Y-chromosomal STR Haplotype Reference Database (YHRD; http://www.yhrd.org/) () to then be compared with our results.

 

 

Figure 1. Map of sampling location of the Moken in Chang Island, Ranong Province of Thailand. 

 

Table 1.  General information about the current studied and other populations from the YHRD database.

No.

Country

Population

Code

Linguistic

family

Size

(n)

Accession

number

No.

Country

Population

Code

Linguistic

family

Size

(n)

Accession

number

1

Thailand

Moken

TH-MG

AN

11

This study

31

Malaysia

MY-BY

Bidayuh

AN

113

YA003415

2

Thailand

Thai

TH-TH

TK

140

YA004250

32

Malaysia

MY-CH

Champa

AN

13

YA004033

3

Thailand

Central Thai

TH-CE

TK

256

YA003923

33

Malaysia

MY-IB

Iban

AN

103

YA003416

4

Thailand

Northern Thai

TH-NT

TK

15

YA004164

34

Malaysia

MY-JA

Jawa

AN

14

YA004039

5

Thailand

Padong

TH-PD

ST

13

YA004162

35

Malaysia

MY-KD

Kedah

AN

9

YA004035

6

Thailand

Pwo

TH-PW

ST

15

YA004168

36

Malaysia

MY-KL

Kelantan

AN

43

YA004038

7

Thailand

Shan

TH-SH

TK

12

YA004163

37

Malaysia

MY-KS

Kensiu

AA

16

YA004133

8

Thailand

Skaw

TH-SK

ST

24

YA004167

38

Malaysia

MY-LA

Lanoh

AA

11

YA004134

9

Thailand

Yong

TH-YO

TK

124

YA004161

39

Malaysia

MY-ME

Melanau

AN

104

YA003417

10

Bangladesh

BD-MA

Barma

ST

107

YA004285

40

Malaysia

Minang

MY-MI

AN

23

YA004036

11

Bangladesh

BD-RA

Rakhine

ST

110

YA004284

41

Malaysia

Northern Borneo

MY-NB

AN

51

YA003927

12

China

CN-HA

Han

ST

30

YA003866

42

Malaysia

Rawa

MY-RA

AN

11

YA004034

13

China

CN-FJH

Han

ST

124

YA004397

43

Malaysia

Semai

MY-SE

AA

18

YA004135

14

China

CN-FJS

She

ST

92

YA004031

44

Philippines

Filipino

PH-FP

AN

943

YA002895

YA003206

YA003892

15

China

CN-FZD

Danmin

ST

87

YA004488

45

Philippines

Manila

PH-MA

AN

64

YA003202

16

China

CN-FZS

She

ST

152

YA003747

YA004066

46

Singapore

Malay

SG-ML

AN

556

YA004367

YA003272

17

China

CN-GDH

Han

ST

1623

YA004066

YA004304

YA004330

YA004392

47

Taiwan

Ami

TW-AM

AN

86

YA003920

YA003961

18

China

CN-GXG

Gin

AA

161

YA004217

48

Taiwan

Atayal

TW-AT

AN

240

YA003524

YA003919

YA003964

19

China

CN-GXM

Miao

AA

186

YA004220

49

Taiwan

Bunan

TW-BU

AN

38

YA003918

20

China

CN-GXY

Yao

AA

138

YA004221

50

Taiwan

Han

TW-HA

ST

30

YA003963

21

China

CN-GXZ

Zhuang

TK

2913

YA003542

YA004006

YA004208

YA004222

51

Taiwan

Hakka

TW-HK

ST

22

YA003962

22

China

CN-SZH

Han

ST

136

YA004280

52

Taiwan

Paiwan

TW-PA

AN

237

YA003500

YA003915

23

China

CN-XBD

Dai

TK

92

YA003876

YA003877

53

Taiwan

Puyama

TW-PU

AN

15

YA003913

24

Indonesia

IN-BT

Batak

AN

100

YA003769

54

Taiwan

Rukai

TW-RU

AN

28

YA003916

25

Indonesia

IN-JA

Java

AN

137

YA003200

YA003770

 

55

Taiwan

Saisiat

TW-SA

AN

24

YA003914

26

Lao

LA-LT

Laotian

TK

45

YA003948

56

Taiwan

Tsou

TW-TS

AN

27

YA003912

27

Malaysia

MY-AC

Achen

AN

7

YA004032

57

Taiwan

Yami

TW-YA

AN

24

YA003911

28

Malaysia

MY-BJ

Banjar

AN

18

YA004040

58

Vietnam

Kinh

VN-KI

AA

123

YA003984

29

Malaysia

MY-BT

Bateq

AA

19

YA004131

59

Vietnam

Mong

VN-MO

AA

59

YA003985

30

Malaysia

MY-BU

Bugis

AN

15

YA004037

60

Vietnam

Tay

VN-TA

AA

21

YA003986

Note:   BD: Bangladesh, CN: China, IN: Indonesia, MY: Malaysia, PH: Philippines, SG: Singapore, TH: Thailand, TW: Taiwan, VN: Vietnam.

 

 Y-STR genotyping

All samples were genotyped for 17 Y-chromosomal STR loci (DYS19, DYS389I, DYS389II, DYS390, DYS391, DYS392, DYS393, DYS385a/b, DYS438, DYS439, DYS437, DYS448, DYS456, DYS458, DYS635, and Y-GATA H4) with the AmpFℓSTR Yfiler PCR Amplification Kit, according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Amplification reactions were performed using a GeneAmp PCR System 9700: these products were analyzed in an ABI 3130 sequencer (Applied Biosystems). Genotyping designations were based on a comparison with allelic ladders in the AmpFℓSTR Yfiler PCR Amplification Kit, along with GeneMapper ID-X software (Applied Biosystems).

 

Statistical analyses

The allele and haplotype frequencies were counted directly, and then compared. Each of the haplotypes were found with the YHRD database. Gene diversity (GD) of the 17 Y-chromosomal STR loci and haplotype diversity (h) (Nei, 1987), were calculated using the ARLEQUIN software package v. 3.5.2.2 (Bern, Switzerland) (Excoffier and Lischer, 2010). We also compared haplotype diversity between the Moken and other MSEA and ISEA populations, according to four language families: Austronesian (AN), Austroasiatic (AA), Tai-Kadai (TK), and Sino-Tibetan (ST) from previous studies (Trejaut et al., 2014; Brunelli et al., 2017; RahayuKarmilla et al., 2018).

To ascertain the genetic relationship among populations, we compared the 17 Y-chromosomal STR loci with the published data of 59 Southeast Asian populations, belonging to four linguistic categories (AN, AA, TK, and ST) in the YHRD database (Table 1). The genetic distance (Rst) between pairs of the population and their statistical significance using 10,000 permutations, were estimated by AMOVA and MDS tools of the YHRD. The genetic distance was plotted in two dimensions by means of a multidimensional scaling (MDS) plot, using the XLSTAT statistical software demo version (Addinsoft, Paris, France). A neighbor-joining (NJ) tree was constructed using the MEGA-X (Kumar et al., 2018).

 

 

RESULTS 

Allele frequencies, gene diversities, and haplotype diversity

Given 11 unrelated Moken men, they were analyzed for allele frequency distributions and gene diversities of the 17 Y-chromosomal STR loci (Table 2). A total of 54 alleles from 17 Y-chromosomal STR loci were identified with the corresponding allele frequencies, ranking from 0.0909 to 0.9091. The DYS448 is the highest polymorphic STR locus (7 alleles), and showed the highest gene diversity (GD = 0.9091), whereas the lowest polymorphic STR locus was DYS391 (2 alleles and GD = 0.1818).

Among 11 males, there are nine haplotypes (Table 3), out of which eight were single unique, and one (HAP03) was multiple unique. The haplotype diversity was found to be 0.9455 ± 0.066. When we compared the haplotypes of the Moken with other people from the YHRD database, we found that one haplotype (HAP08) exactly matched that of the ST people from China. The haplotype diversity of the Moken was close to the values from various comparative populations (Trejaut et al, 2014; Brunelli et al, 2017; RahayuKarmilla et al; 2018) (Figure 2).

 

Figure 2. Comparison of haplotype diversity between the Moken and other Southeast Asian people. The error bars show range of haplotype diversity within linguistic family. (p = the number of populations).

 

Table 2. Allele frequencies and gene diversities of the 17 Y-chromosomal STR loci of the Moken

Allele

DYS19

DYS389l

DYS389ll

DYS390

DYS391

DYS392

DYS393

DYS437

DYS438

DYS439

DYS448

DYS456

DYS458

DYS635

YGATA H4

Genotype

DYS385

9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.4545

 

 

 

 

 

 

11, 16

0.1111

10

 

 

 

 

0.9091

 

 

 

0.2727

 

 

 

 

 

 

12, 12

0.1111

11

 

0.0909

 

 

0.0909

0.0909

 

 

0.2727

0.4545

 

 

 

 

0.4545

13, 15

0.2222

12

 

0.1818

 

 

 

0.0909

0.3636

 

 

0.2727

 

 

 

 

0.4545

13, 20

0.1111

13

 

0.2727

 

 

 

0.4545

0.6364

 

 

0.2727

 

 

 

 

0.0909

13, 21

0.2222

14

0.7273

0.4545

 

 

 

0.3636

 

0.3636

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14, 19

0.2222

15

0.2727

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.4545

 

 

0.2727

0.7273

 

 

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.1818

 

 

0.1818

0.0909

0.2727

 

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.1818

0.2727

 

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.1818

 

0.1818

 

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.0909

 

 

0.2727

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.0909

 

0.1818

0.4545

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

0.2727

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.0909

 

0.0909

0.1818

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

0.4545

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.0909

 

 

 

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

0.2727

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.0909

 

 

 

27

 

 

0.0909

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

28

 

 

0.1818

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

29

 

 

0.0909

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30

 

 

0.4545

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

32

 

 

0.1818

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GD

0.4364

0.7454

0.7818

0.7091

0.1818

0.7091

0.5091

0.6910

0.7091

0.7091

0.9091

0.4727

0.8546

0.7636

0.6367

-

0.9020

Note: GD: gene diversity

 

Table 3.   Y-chromosome haplotype distribution of the Moken, based on the 17 Y-chromosomal STR loci.

Haplotype

DYS19

DYS385a

DYS385b

DYS389l

DYS398ll

DYS390

DYS391

DYS392

DYS393

DYS437

DYS438

DYS439

DYS448

DYS456

DYS458

DYS635

GATA-4

Frequency

HAP01

15

11

16

12

28

21

10

11

12

14

10

11

21

15

18

23

13

0.0909

HAP02

15

13

20

11

27

23

10

13

12

15

10

12

22

16

17

21

12

0.0909

HAP03

14

14

19

14

30

22

10

14

13

14

9

11

15

15

16

19

11

0.2727

HAP04

14

13

21

13

30

22

11

13

13

15

9

12

16

15

17

20

11

0.0909

HAP05

14

13

21

13

30

22

10

13

13

15

9

12

16

15

17

21

11

0.0909

HAP06

15

12

12

13

29

23

10

12

12

15

10

11

19

15

20

20

12

0.0909

HAP07

14

13

15

14

32

21

10

13

13

16

11

13

18

17

20

20

12

0.0909

HAP08

14

14

19

12

28

23

10

14

12

15

11

13

20

15

18

20

12

0.0909

HAP09

14

13

15

14

32

21

10

13

13

16

11

13

18

17

21

20

12

0.0909

 

Genetic relationship among populations

The genetic distance (Rst) among the population indicated that the Moken population (TH-MG) was not significantly different from the Acheh (MY-AC), the Champa (MY-CH), and the Minang (MY-MI) people from Malaysia, who speak the AN language, along with the ST-speaking Hakka (TW-HK) from Taiwan.

The multidimensional scaling (MDS) plot revealed that the Moken (TH-MG) were separated from other populations, reflecting some degree of differentiation and unique genetic structure. The TK- and ST-speaking groups were clustered together in the center of the plot, indicating their close genetic relationship. The AA- and AN-speaking groups were scattered around the plot indicating genetic heterogeneity. However, eight aboriginal Taiwanese (TW-AM, TW-AT, TW-PA, TW-PU, TW-RK, TW-SA, TW-TS, and TW-YA) were dispersed in the lower right quadrant of the plot, reflecting their divergence (Figure 3).

The NJ tree showed five clusters of population: the Moken population (TH-MG) was not clustered with their linguistic relatives (clusters 3, 4, and 5), but were rather close to the ST group cluster (cluster 1). TK groups were located in cluster 2, while the AA-speaking groups were scattered throughout the tree (Figure 4).

 

Figure 3. Multidimensional scaling (MDS) plot based on Rst values for 60 populations. Red star, purple triangle, green square and blue circle symbols indicate Austronesian, Austroasiatic, Sino-Tibetan and Tai-Kadai populations, respectively (See abbreviations of populations in Table 1). The stress value is 0.188.

 

 

Figure 4.   Neighbor-joining (NJ) tree constructed from the Rst values among 60 populations. Red star, purple triangle, green square and blue circle symbols indicate Austronesian, Austroasiatic, Sino-Tibetan and Tai-Kadai population, respectively (See abbreviations of populations in Table 1).

DISCUSSION 

This study investigated the genetic structure of 17 Y-chromosome STR loci in 11 Moken males living on Chang Island, originally from Ranong Province, Thailand. The Moken are a group of sea nomads living in the Andaman Sea area who speak a local language, which is classified as an AN-language family. The results show that there are nine haplotypes, with high haplotype diversity (0.9455 ± 0.066), which is close to other Southeast Asian people from previous studies (Trejaut et al., 2014; Brunelli et al., 2017; RahayuKarmilla et al., 2018). The AmpFℓSTR Yfiler PCR Amplification Kit have been used to analyze the Y-chromosome in various populations (Grskovic et al., 2010; Santana et al., 2014). When the identified haplotypes in the Moken were compared with those available from the YHRD database, one was found to match a sample from the Han in China who speak ST languages, thus suggesting that the male Moken may have a genetic relationship with them. This is consistent with other reports about ancestors of the present-day AN population or “Proto-Austronesian speakers,” originating in the area that is now Southeast China (Diamond and Bellwood, 2003; Hwa et al., 2010; Wu et al., 2013).

The genetic relationships between Moken males and those from 59 other Southeast Asian groups showed that the Moken were distantly related to other Austronesian groups, but they tend to relate to certain AN groups in Malaysia and ST groups in Taiwan (Figure 3). The NJ tree suggested that Moken males are distinct from other Austronesian groups; however, they are in a linguistically-mixed cluster, consisting mainly of the ST population (Figure 4). These results show that the Moken male exhibited genetic relationships with both the AN and ST groups, while at the same time, Moken males possess their own unique genetic structure.

A comparison of the Y-chromosomal STR data analyses to the control region in mtDNA data analyses of the same group of Moken (Seetaraso et al., 2019), revealed the difference between their paternal and maternal lineage. Their mitochondrial lineage is close to not only AN, but also to the AA people. As a contradiction, the Y-chromosomal lineage of the Moken is closely related to other AN groups, including a few to ST groups. From this point of view, there are contrasting genetic structures and patterns of female and male lineage in the Moken from Chang Island, Ranong Province. This might result from different microevolutionary forces in male and female lineages. Sex-biased demographic histories of males and females have been reported in previous studies of the Southeast Asian island populations (Kayser et al., 2008; Tumonggor et al., 2013), reflecting an unequal and complex population.

This is one of the studies focusing on the genetic structure of Y-chromosome STR in the Moken of Ranong Province from Thailand. The Moken show a paternal genetic pattern that is unique, but closer to the Austronesian groups of Malaysia and the ST group of Taiwan. These may share a common ancestry, or they may have mixed with them. This study is limited, in that no information on the Y-chromosomal single nucleotide polymorphism (Y-SNP) is included. Further investigation of SNPs will be necessary to identify the origin of the Moken and also that of other Sea Nomadic groups, i.e., the Urak Lawoi and Moken.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

We would like to thank all volunteers and participants who donated their biological samples. This study was funded by Naresuan University (Grant No. R2561B029 and R2562B085). JK acknowledged partially supports by Chiang Mai University, Thailand.

REFERENCES

Barbieri, C., Vicente, M., Rocha, J., Mpoloka, S.W., Stoneking, M., and Pakendorf, B. 2013. Ancient substructure in early mtDNA lineages of southern Africa. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 92(2): 285-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.12.010

Brunelli, A., Kampuansai, J., Seielstad, M., Lomthaisong, K., Kangwanpong, D., Ghirotto, S., and Kutanan, W. 2017. Y chromosomal evidence on the origin of northern thai people. PLoS One. 12(7): e0181935. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181935

Dancause, K.N., Chan, C.W., Arunotai, N.H., and Lum, J.K. 2009. Origins of the moken sea gypsies inferred from mitochondrial hypervariable region and whole genome sequences. Journal of Human Genetics. 54(2): 86-93.

Diamond, J., and Bellwood, P. 2003. Farmers and their languages: the first expansions. Science. 300(5619): 597-603. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1078208

Excoffier, L., and Lischer, H.E. 2010. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: A new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Molecular Ecology Resources. 10(3): 564-567. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02847.x

Grskovic, B., Mrsic, G., Vrdoljak, A., Merkas, S., Andelinovic, S. 2015. Population genetic analysis of haplotypes based on 17 short tandem repeat loci on Y chromosome in population sample from Eastern Croatia. Croatian Medical Journal. 51(3): 202-208. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2010.51.202

Hinshiranan, N. 1996. The analysis of Moken opportunistic foragers' intragroup and intergroup relations [dissertation]. United States: University of Hawaii.

Hwa, H.L., Tseng, L.H., Ko, T.M., Chang, Y.Y., Yin, H.Y., Su, Y.N., and Lee, J.C. 2010. Seventeen Y-chromosomal short tandem repeat haplotypes in seven groups of population living in Taiwan. Journal of Legal Medicine. 124(4): 295-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-010-0425-9 

Jobling, M.A., and Tyler-Smith, C. 2003. The human Y chromosome: An evolutionary marker comes of age. Nature Reviews Genetics. 4(8):598-612. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1124 

Kayser, M., Choi, Y.Y., Oven, M.V., Mona, S., Brauer, S., Trent, R.J., Suarkia, D.L., Lehmann, C., and Stoneking, M. 2008. The impact of the Austronesian expansion: evidence from mtDNA and Y chromosome diversity in the admiralty Islands of Melanesia. Molecular biology and evolution. 25(7): 1362-1374. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msn078

Koechlin, B. 1967. The Sea Nomads. A Study Based on the Literature of the Maritime Boat People of Southeast Asia. Lim Bian Han, Singapore.

Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C., and Tamura, K. 2018. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 35(6): 1547-1549. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096

Lum, J.K., Cann, R.L., Martinson, J.J., and Jorde, L.B. 1998. Mitochondrial and nuclear genetic relationships among pacific island and Asian populations. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 63(2): 613-624. https://doi.org/10.1086/301949

Maca-Meyer, N., Gonzalez, A.M., Larruga, J.M., Flores, C., and Cabrera, V.M. 2001. Major genomic mitochondrial lineages delineate early human expansions. BMC genetics. 2: 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-2-13

Nei, M. 1987. Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New York.

RahayuKarmilla, S.S., Aedrianee, A.R., Haslindawaty, A.R., Azeelah, A.N., Panneerchelvam, S., Norazmi, M.N., and Zafarina, Z. 2018. Paternal lineage affinity of the Malay subethnic and Orang Asli populations in Peninsular Malaysia. International Journal of Legal Medicine. 132(4): 1087-1090.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1697-0 

Richards, M., Macaulay, V., Hickey, E., Vega, E., Sykes, B., Guida, V., Rengo, C., Sellitto, D., Cruciani, F., Kivisild, T., et al. 2000. Tracing European founder lineages in the near eastern mtdna pool. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 67(5): 1251-1276.

Santana, C., Noris, G., Meraz-Ríos, M.A., Magaña, J.J., Calderon-Aranda, E.S., de Lourdes Muñoz, M., and Gómez, R. 2014. Genetic analysis of 17 Y-STRs in a Mestizo population from the Central Valley of Mexico. Human Biology. 86(4): 289-312. https://doi.org/10.13110/humanbiology.86.4.0289

Seetaraso, T., Kutanan, W., and Srikummool, M. 2019. Mitochondrial DNA variations of the Moken in Ranong Province, Thailand. Proceedings of the 20th National Graduate Research Conference. 2019 Mar 15; Thailand. Khon Kaen, p.469-480.

Trejaut, J.A., Poloni, E.S., Yen, J.C., Lai, Y.H., Loo, J.H., Lee, C.L., He, C.L., and Lin, M. 2014. Taiwan Y-chromosomal DNA variation and its relationship with Island Southeast Asia. BMC Genetics. 15(1):77. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-15-77

Tumonggor, M.K., Karafet, T.M., Hallmark, B., Lansing, J.S., Sudoyo, H., Hammer, M.F. and Cox, M.P. 2013. The Indonesian archipelago: an ancient genetic highway linking Asia and the Pacific. Journal of Human Genetics. 58(3): 165-173. 

Wu, F.C., Chen, M.Y., Chao, C.H., and Pu, C.E. 2013. Study on the genetic polymorphisms of Y chromosomal DNA short tandem repeat loci applied to analyzing the relative affinities among ethnic groups in Taiwan. Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series. 4(1): e69-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigss.2013.10.035

Y Chromosome Consortium. 2002. A nomenclature system for the tree of human Y-chromosomal binary haplogroups. Genome Research. 12(2): 339-348. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.217602

 

 

Tanapon Seetaraso1, Wibhu Kutanan2, Jatupol Kampuansai3,4, Kanha Muisuk5, and Metawee Srikummool1* 

1Faculty of Medical Science, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok 65000, Thailand

2Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand

3Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand

4Center of Excellence in Bioresources for Agriculture, Industry and Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand

5Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand

 

*Corresponding author: metaweesr@nu.ac.th


Total Article Views


Article history:

Received: January 12, 2020

Revised: May 1, 2020

Accepted: May 8, 2020